The Environmental Protection Agency said these big cuts to pollution could generate up to $85 billion in climate and health benefits for the country by 2042.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Commissioner Brian Rockensuess said many of these technologies haven’t been proven at the scale needed for Indiana utilities. Even if they were, he said that’s not enough time for them to get the permits, and permissions and build the infrastructure needed for these projects.
“How do we permit them knowing that they're going to be out of compliance the minute we give them that permit?” Rockensuess said.
Join the conversation and sign up for the Indiana Two-Way. Text “Indiana” to 73224. Your comments and questions in response to our weekly text help us find the answers you need on statewide issues, including this series on climate change and solutions.
Skip Kropp is a lawyer who represents the utility trade organization Midwest Ozone Group — which often opposes stricter pollution standards. Kropp said moving away from fossil fuels would threaten reliability — especially at a time when extreme weather has led to the possibility of more outages.
“The proposed rule exacerbates significant risks that have developed because of the mandatory energy source transition, including ongoing and premature retirements of dispatchable resources,” he said.
Resources that can produce energy at any time — unlike wind and solar.
It’s worth noting that climate change — caused by the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas — is making things like extreme heat more likely.
No one in favor of the EPA’s proposed rule to cut carbon emissions at power plants was asked to speak at the committee.